Wednesday, March 11, 2009

Education and the Scientific Method

It is interesting to me that education is one of those fields where everyone has a tenaciously held opinion about what it is, how it works, or why it doesn't despite not having any training or background in the field beyond having been educated. For myself, that is like saying "Of course I can sew my own jacket, I have been wearing one for years" or "I can fix your car; I have been driving since I was a kid." Pronouncements on the credibility or the veracity of learning theories or tools come fast and furious from people who do not engage in education as a discipline in itself or its research. This is why we still get teachers that tell us "they don't let" their students use Wikipedia, quote from blogs, or will ever consider using Second Life, etc. I mean, insert whatever-it-is-they-do-not-quite-understand here. These are the same students, when sent to the library to research geology or anthropology do not come back with citations from "Chariots of the Gods," hollow earth literature, or other non-academically viable sources. The students have the critical thinking skills required to go into a library, and despite the library containing books on astrology or conspiracy theories, that sort of thing tends not to be cited by students. Why can't instructors have the same faith in students on the internet? Who said it was our job to "let" or not let the students do anything? I won't harp on Wikipedia further because there is already enough actual research from journals like Nature that say that Wikipedia articles were shown to be just as accurate as anything in peer reviewed articles. The problem with things like Wikipedia or learning online in any form is that it is new. Books and traditional journals safely fit into the framework of traditional teaching. The increasing amount of available information, the users ability to participate in the creation of that information, and the myriad ways of accessing and aggregating that information are all shaking that traditional framework to its 1200 year-old foundation. All of a sudden it is very difficult for traditional teachers to evaluate online sources, information and tools because their sources of peer-reviewed information are always printed one to two years late with sources that are three to four years old - an eternity on the internet. And here we introduce fear. The last thing you do when you are afraid is ask questions: you certainly aren't going to bother with research, create an hypothesis, test it, and analyze data. You are going to run straight to drawing your conclusions and broadcasting your "results" because you feel threatened. This has never been about whether something is a good teaching tool or not but about our ability to adapt to change. Good teachers are often good communicators and when good communicators connect with tools that facilitate communication and interaction, good teaching happens whether that tool is a clay tablet and a stylus or a virtual world.

5 comments:

  1. Bravissimo Caro.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nice post Geoff. I always thought the term "Academic Freedom" should apply to all.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great post! The fact of the matter is, regardless of the fact that teachers "don't let" their students use Wikipedia, when they get home, they read it anyway! Best insight into how to use Wikipedia was offered by my daughter when she was in high school. She said to read the relevant articles to get some background information, check for the citations at the bottom of the post and use those resources for the legitimate research. Even when you don't use Wikipedia in the bibliography, you can still learn something from the articles. So that's exactly what I tell the students I work with in Middle School.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Geof, your post (Nadine N's comment as well) is a testament to let's not teach what we know but show a 'way(s)' to how we come to know what we know and how to use IT. Indeed, IT's all about asking a question and finding a way to investigate IT; then, doing IT and upon reflection discovering something new or extended which then leads to unearthing other questions. Education is a 'together' process of re-discovery/discovery.

    ReplyDelete